<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: vBulletin 4 &#8211; Revolutionary or Disturbingly Flawed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vbtruth.com/vbulletin-4-revolutionary-or-disturbingly-flawed/177/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vbtruth.com/vbulletin-4-revolutionary-or-disturbingly-flawed/177/</link>
	<description>Shining Light on Internet Brand&#039;s Disaster</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:15:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrgtb</title>
		<link>http://vbtruth.com/vbulletin-4-revolutionary-or-disturbingly-flawed/177/comment-page-1/#comment-1595</link>
		<dc:creator>mrgtb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbtruth.com/?p=177#comment-1595</guid>
		<description>[quote]

Honestly it’s a flop. I don’t take software as being ground work for future releases, or as a building block, it is what it is right now since they slapped the vB 4 Gold Tag on it, and in many aspects it’s a complete failure (more failures, than successes).

The styling is one of the few positive changes, not the default style though (by any stretch of the imagination), but the CSS driven layout thats easily customizable and easier to obtain advanced looks and stlying than in previous vBulletin versions. However thats as far as it goes as positives for the styling.

The variables they’re using and how it’s coded is hugely inefficent. The graphics are like something that was designed in a matter of minutes and exported on the lowest possible settings, (While still not being properly optimized).

The CSS and HTML isn’t valid, and they don’t care, there is virtually no support for older browsers other than “We’re working on it” which by the time they’ve figured it out will probably warrant another point release.

The SEO (if you can call it that) is a travesty to even get that label. The friendly URL’s are hideous, and while they maybe human readable, they are far, far from being good at search engine optimized.

They’ve released 4.0, and since then over a thousand new bugs have been introduced, and more continue getting reported daily. Many of which they have no fix for, or are labeling for a maintainence release like 4.0.1 or 4.0.2, one of those probably should have been the gold version.

Honestly, vB 4 is that train wreck a former developer mentioned. The company behind vBulletin isn’t there for any other reason than to milk the cash cow, and trust me soon as they milk it dry they’ll leave thousands out in the cold. Just look at how they’ve ran the majority of their communities into the ground, many of which would be considered to be inactive.
[/quote]

Very well said indeed and I agree with everything you&#039;ve said. I do think looking back at how I used to feel about vBulletin before, that it&#039;s very sad really how much both mine and other peoples views have now changed about them.

A day never used to go by that I wasn&#039;t on the site posted stuff, keeping involved with what was happening there. Now I hadrly ever go there at all, and have lost total interest in the forum, software, and company.

All a bit sad to be honest. But what you said above sums-up my same feelings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote]</p>
<p>Honestly it’s a flop. I don’t take software as being ground work for future releases, or as a building block, it is what it is right now since they slapped the vB 4 Gold Tag on it, and in many aspects it’s a complete failure (more failures, than successes).</p>
<p>The styling is one of the few positive changes, not the default style though (by any stretch of the imagination), but the CSS driven layout thats easily customizable and easier to obtain advanced looks and stlying than in previous vBulletin versions. However thats as far as it goes as positives for the styling.</p>
<p>The variables they’re using and how it’s coded is hugely inefficent. The graphics are like something that was designed in a matter of minutes and exported on the lowest possible settings, (While still not being properly optimized).</p>
<p>The CSS and HTML isn’t valid, and they don’t care, there is virtually no support for older browsers other than “We’re working on it” which by the time they’ve figured it out will probably warrant another point release.</p>
<p>The SEO (if you can call it that) is a travesty to even get that label. The friendly URL’s are hideous, and while they maybe human readable, they are far, far from being good at search engine optimized.</p>
<p>They’ve released 4.0, and since then over a thousand new bugs have been introduced, and more continue getting reported daily. Many of which they have no fix for, or are labeling for a maintainence release like 4.0.1 or 4.0.2, one of those probably should have been the gold version.</p>
<p>Honestly, vB 4 is that train wreck a former developer mentioned. The company behind vBulletin isn’t there for any other reason than to milk the cash cow, and trust me soon as they milk it dry they’ll leave thousands out in the cold. Just look at how they’ve ran the majority of their communities into the ground, many of which would be considered to be inactive.<br />
[/quote]</p>
<p>Very well said indeed and I agree with everything you&#8217;ve said. I do think looking back at how I used to feel about vBulletin before, that it&#8217;s very sad really how much both mine and other peoples views have now changed about them.</p>
<p>A day never used to go by that I wasn&#8217;t on the site posted stuff, keeping involved with what was happening there. Now I hadrly ever go there at all, and have lost total interest in the forum, software, and company.</p>
<p>All a bit sad to be honest. But what you said above sums-up my same feelings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://vbtruth.com/vbulletin-4-revolutionary-or-disturbingly-flawed/177/comment-page-1/#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbtruth.com/?p=177#comment-1487</guid>
		<description>This is a company that has pulled up the drawbridge and retreated behind the ramparts as more and more customer’s voice concerns.  Their view is that vb3 licence holders do not exist; there is no avenue for legal remedy in the UK as Wayne told me the other day, no office, nothing.  They state that be buying vb4 at the discount price you have in effect nulled your vb3 licence, which is absolute nonsense. An owned licence is just that, you can run one instance for life; vb4 is a separate product and licence.  It is obvious from Wayne and Steve that much of the so called rules are being made up on the hoof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a company that has pulled up the drawbridge and retreated behind the ramparts as more and more customer’s voice concerns.  Their view is that vb3 licence holders do not exist; there is no avenue for legal remedy in the UK as Wayne told me the other day, no office, nothing.  They state that be buying vb4 at the discount price you have in effect nulled your vb3 licence, which is absolute nonsense. An owned licence is just that, you can run one instance for life; vb4 is a separate product and licence.  It is obvious from Wayne and Steve that much of the so called rules are being made up on the hoof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David McHenry</title>
		<link>http://vbtruth.com/vbulletin-4-revolutionary-or-disturbingly-flawed/177/comment-page-1/#comment-1472</link>
		<dc:creator>David McHenry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbtruth.com/?p=177#comment-1472</guid>
		<description>Honestly it&#039;s a flop. I don&#039;t take software as being ground work for future releases, or as a building block, it is what it is right now since they slapped the vB 4 Gold Tag on it, and in many aspects it&#039;s a complete failure (more failures, than successes).

The styling is one of the few positive changes, not the default style though (by any stretch of the imagination), but the CSS driven layout thats easily customizable and easier to obtain advanced looks and stlying than in previous vBulletin versions. However thats as far as it goes as positives for the styling.

The variables they&#039;re using and how it&#039;s coded is hugely inefficent. The graphics are like something that was designed in a matter of minutes and exported on the lowest possible settings, (While still not being properly optimized).

The CSS and HTML isn&#039;t valid, and they don&#039;t care, there is virtually no support for older browsers other than &quot;We&#039;re working on it&quot; which by the time they&#039;ve figured it out will probably warrant another point release.

The SEO (if you can call it that) is a travesty to even get that label. The friendly URL&#039;s are hideous, and while they maybe human readable, they are far, far from being good at search engine optimized.

They&#039;ve released 4.0, and since then over a thousand new bugs have been introduced, and more continue getting reported daily. Many of which they have no fix for, or are labeling for a maintainence release like 4.0.1 or 4.0.2, one of those probably should have been the gold version.

Honestly, vB 4 is that train wreck a former developer mentioned. The company behind vBulletin isn&#039;t there for any other reason than to milk the cash cow, and trust me soon as they milk it dry they&#039;ll leave thousands out in the cold. Just look at how they&#039;ve ran the majority of their communities into the ground, many of which would be considered to be inactive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly it&#8217;s a flop. I don&#8217;t take software as being ground work for future releases, or as a building block, it is what it is right now since they slapped the vB 4 Gold Tag on it, and in many aspects it&#8217;s a complete failure (more failures, than successes).</p>
<p>The styling is one of the few positive changes, not the default style though (by any stretch of the imagination), but the CSS driven layout thats easily customizable and easier to obtain advanced looks and stlying than in previous vBulletin versions. However thats as far as it goes as positives for the styling.</p>
<p>The variables they&#8217;re using and how it&#8217;s coded is hugely inefficent. The graphics are like something that was designed in a matter of minutes and exported on the lowest possible settings, (While still not being properly optimized).</p>
<p>The CSS and HTML isn&#8217;t valid, and they don&#8217;t care, there is virtually no support for older browsers other than &#8220;We&#8217;re working on it&#8221; which by the time they&#8217;ve figured it out will probably warrant another point release.</p>
<p>The SEO (if you can call it that) is a travesty to even get that label. The friendly URL&#8217;s are hideous, and while they maybe human readable, they are far, far from being good at search engine optimized.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve released 4.0, and since then over a thousand new bugs have been introduced, and more continue getting reported daily. Many of which they have no fix for, or are labeling for a maintainence release like 4.0.1 or 4.0.2, one of those probably should have been the gold version.</p>
<p>Honestly, vB 4 is that train wreck a former developer mentioned. The company behind vBulletin isn&#8217;t there for any other reason than to milk the cash cow, and trust me soon as they milk it dry they&#8217;ll leave thousands out in the cold. Just look at how they&#8217;ve ran the majority of their communities into the ground, many of which would be considered to be inactive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheat-master30</title>
		<link>http://vbtruth.com/vbulletin-4-revolutionary-or-disturbingly-flawed/177/comment-page-1/#comment-1332</link>
		<dc:creator>cheat-master30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 17:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbtruth.com/?p=177#comment-1332</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think vBulletin 4 is the ground work for something revolutionary, but the gold version recently released is far from satisfactory in any respects.  Too many bugs.  Too many browser incompatibilities.  Less features than the original 3.8 in some respects, which is just plain bad.  It has potential, and the blogs and forum are quite good, but the CMS is just poor right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think vBulletin 4 is the ground work for something revolutionary, but the gold version recently released is far from satisfactory in any respects.  Too many bugs.  Too many browser incompatibilities.  Less features than the original 3.8 in some respects, which is just plain bad.  It has potential, and the blogs and forum are quite good, but the CMS is just poor right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingPin</title>
		<link>http://vbtruth.com/vbulletin-4-revolutionary-or-disturbingly-flawed/177/comment-page-1/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>KingPin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbtruth.com/?p=177#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>I lost my trust the day day banned me from the forums for asking why the customers like me who paid for blogs and tracker were not being answered. after that it wasnt down hill but rather a sharp drop into a bottomless pit for IB/VB as far as im concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lost my trust the day day banned me from the forums for asking why the customers like me who paid for blogs and tracker were not being answered. after that it wasnt down hill but rather a sharp drop into a bottomless pit for IB/VB as far as im concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veritas</title>
		<link>http://vbtruth.com/vbulletin-4-revolutionary-or-disturbingly-flawed/177/comment-page-1/#comment-1271</link>
		<dc:creator>Veritas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbtruth.com/?p=177#comment-1271</guid>
		<description>Thank you AWS. For those looking for those thoughts, here&#039;s the link :)
http://bobschwarz.com/vbulletin-4-gold-review-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you AWS. For those looking for those thoughts, here&#8217;s the link <img src='http://vbtruth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<a href="http://bobschwarz.com/vbulletin-4-gold-review-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly" rel="nofollow">http://bobschwarz.com/vbulletin-4-gold-review-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWS</title>
		<link>http://vbtruth.com/vbulletin-4-revolutionary-or-disturbingly-flawed/177/comment-page-1/#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator>AWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbtruth.com/?p=177#comment-1270</guid>
		<description>You can see my thoughts on vb4 at my blog. As a long time vbulletin user I have lost all trust in the company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can see my thoughts on vb4 at my blog. As a long time vbulletin user I have lost all trust in the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
